SaaS companies are constantly evolving their software. Updates, new features, bug fixes: these changes are essential to maintain the quality of service. But how far can a SaaS companymodify its SaaS during the contract without the customer's agreement?
SaaS is based on an evolving model. The publisher is constantly improving its software to meet market needs, strengthen security or comply with regulatory changes. Customers benefit from it without intervention on their part. However, these changes can also worry them, especially if they impact their uses, cause a loss of functionalities or disrupt integration with other tools. This flexibility is an asset, but it must be managed.
The contract defines the scope of possible changes. Several scenarios exist:
To avoid any dispute, the contract must specify:
In the absence of a specific clause, the customer cannot object to current updates. But if a major modification impacts the use of SaaS and in particular its security or functionalities, it may invoke a contractual breach. Some contracts provide for an option to cancel without penalty in the event of a substantial change.
A SaaS must evolve, but this evolution should not create uncertainty for customers. A clear contractual framework and effective communication are essential to avoid tensions. I can help you secure your SaaS contracts and prevent the risks associated with updates.
What classes, and products/services should be included in a trademark for a mobile application?
The transfer clause in SaaS agremeent is a trap: a customer should not be able to prohibit an important operation for the SaaS company. How should it be drafted?
Let's build together to grow your business